Prediction of Nerman Fatic vs Gokberk Ergeneman Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fatic vs G. Ergeneman

Nerman Fatic

BIH

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

212

C. Rank

Ret.

191

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Gokberk Ergeneman

TUR

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

212

C. Rank

Ret.

191

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Fatic 2 - 0 Ergeneman

They have played 4 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 4 and Gokberk Ergeneman winning 0. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Gokberk Ergeneman was at the Turkey F47, 23-11-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-1 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Fatic	2
Ergeneman	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R1) Turkey F47(11-23-16)

Stats

Nerman Fatic

Gokberk Ergeneman

(R1) Turkey F16(04-20-15)

Stats

Nerman Fatic

Gokberk Ergeneman

N. Fatic vs G. Ergeneman H2H Profile

N. Fatic	Stats	G. Ergeneman
$73,995	Career Prize Money	$0
58.47% (404-287)	Career Total W/L	37.64% (67-111)
2	Hard	0
12	Titles	0
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0.00% (0-1)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Fatic vs G. Ergeneman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nerman Fatic has won 44.96% of points on their second serve, while Gokberk Ergeneman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nerman Fatic, in recent form, has won 45.79% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gokberk Ergeneman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.53% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nerman Fatic has saved 53.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gokberk Ergeneman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nerman Fatic has won 72.31% of matches played (W/L 47/18), with Gokberk Ergeneman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Gokberk Ergeneman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 42/59), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.10% of matches (W/L 25/14), where as Gokberk Ergeneman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nerman Fatic winning 2 times and Gokberk Ergeneman being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 4 and Gokberk Ergeneman winning 0.
The last match between Nerman Fatic and Gokberk Ergeneman was at the Turkey F47, 23-11-2016, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:31:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nerman Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 326.03 while Gokberk Ergeneman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nerman Fatic has won 81% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gokberk Ergeneman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nerman Fatic has converted 30.72% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gokberk Ergeneman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nerman Fatic vs Gokberk Ergeneman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Fatic vs G. Ergeneman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Fatic	Stats	G. Ergeneman
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	0
24	Games Won	7
3	Aces (Total)	1
3	Total Double Faults	4
0:31:0	Average Match Time	0:31:0
64% (36/56)	1st Serve %	61% (27/44)
75% (27/36)	1st Serve Win %	48% (13/27)
45% (9/20)	2nd Serve Win %	35% (6/17)
63% (5/8)	Break Pts Won %	17% (1/6)
57% (25/44)	Return Points Win %	36% (20/56)
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bergamo Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Federico ArnaboldiF. Arnaboldi	L	7-5 4-6 7-5	Stats
R1 Fabrizio AndaloroF. Andaloro	W	6-4 6-6 ret.	Stats
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Calvin HemeryC. Hemery	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Bol - 20-10-2025
R2 Marko MiladinovicM. Miladinovic	L	7-6(2) ret.	Stats
R1 Antonio VoljavecA. Voljavec	W	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

G. Ergeneman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M15 Antalya - 07-12-2020
Q1 Vladislav IvanovV. Ivanov	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
M15 Antalya - 30-11-2020
Q1 Nini Gabriel DicaN. Gabriel	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
M25 Antalya - 24-02-2020
Q1 Gokberk SaritasG. Saritas	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
M15 Antalya - 03-02-2020
Q1 Cengiz AksuC. Aksu	L	6-4 2-6 11-9	Stats
M15 Antalya - 27-01-2020
Q2 Alex Marti PujolrasA. Marti	L	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

N. Fatic vs G. Ergeneman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Fatic	Stats	G. Ergeneman
58.47% (404/287)	YTD Win/Loss	37.64% (67/111)
57.49% (890/658)	Sets Win/Loss	38.44% (148/237)
53.03% (7602/6734)	Games Win/Loss	44.97% (1499/1834)
51.19% (43/41)	Hard Win/Loss	33.33% (25/50)
61.00% (341/218)	Clay Win/Loss	41.58% (42/59)
43.48% (20/26)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/2)
0.00% (0/2)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.23	Aces Per Game	0.03
1598	Aces Total	47
0.22	Double Faults Per Game	0.06
1517	Total Double Faults	92
1:20:1	Average Match Time	1st Match
509.22	Average Opponent Rank	343.38
66% (23791/35820)	1st Serve %	60% (1239/2070)
65% (15579/23791)	1st Serve Win %	54% (675/1239)
48% (5772/12029)	2nd Serve Win %	45% (376/831)
47% (1969/4222)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (68/169)
43% (15618/36165)	Return Points Win %	38% (760/1988)
20.00% (1/4)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
40.00% (4/6)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
25.00% (3/9)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
52.89% (119/106)	Challenger W/L	20.00% (2/8)
63.24% (277/161)	Futures W/L	38.69% (65/103)
60% (394/662)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	37% (65/175)
0% (0/3)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
51% (79/156)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	38% (9/24)
54% (102/189)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (16/32)
88% (394/348)	1st Set Won, Won Match	86% (64/55)
11% (394/42)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (64/9)
19% (297/57)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	10% (114/11)